[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLbsx+H5NBY25XxH+cRSejJWZ2-v1fa2-GQ-y3VJa-h0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:51:08 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: ignore arguments to %n
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com> wrote:
> On 28/01/14 11:39, Kees Cook wrote:
>> If arguments are consumed without output when encountering %n, it
>> could be used to benefit or improve information leak attacks that were
>> exposed via a limited size buffer. Since %n is not used by the kernel,
>> there is no reason to make an info leak attack any easier.
>
> I was thinking more like the following. Print the warning if %n is
> detected in format_decode(), but otherwise just remove the handling of
> %n outright and treat it like any other invalid format specifier.
> Something like this completely untested patch. Thoughts?
I'd be totally fine with it. Minor typo in the comment before the
WARN_ONCE (should be "its" instead of "it"), but otherwise looks good.
Consider it:
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
It builds and boots fine for me, FWIW.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists