[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E83577.6040504@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:55:51 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: Add limit checking to memblock_virt_alloc
On 01/28/2014 02:47 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>> On 01/28/2014 02:04 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> In original bootmem wrapper for memblock, we have limit checking.
>>>
>>> Add it to memblock_virt_alloc, to address arm and x86 booting crash.
>>>
>> Do you have a git tree or cumulative set of patches that you'd like us
>> to all test? I'm happy to boot it on my system, I just want to make
>> sure I've got the same set that you're testing.
>
> This one should only affect on arm and x86 the 32 bit kernel with more
> then 4G RAM.
OK, let me rephrase.
Does anyone want me to test this on a 1TB 64-bit x86 system? If yes,
please tell me which patches you want me to test, and on top of which
kernel. I have three patches in this area, I think, but I don't want to
waste my time testing and reporting the wrong thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists