linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: fix page->

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140129081352.GA20914@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:13:52 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	penberg@...nel.org, mpm@...enic.com, pshelar@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: fix page->_count corruption (again)

Hi Dave,

> > Fengguang, could you run a set of tests for the top patch in this branch
> > to see if we'd be giving much up by axing the code?
> > 
> > 	https://github.com/hansendc/linux/tree/slub-nocmpxchg-for-Fengguang-20140128
> 
> Sure, I've queued tests for the branch. Will report back after 1-2
> days.

btw, just a tip, it would normally cost half time if the branch is
based directly on a mainline (RC) release, eg. v3.13, v3.13-rcX.
Because to evaluate a branch, we need to test&compare its BASE and
HEAD. If the BASE is v3.* kernels, the test infrastructure will very
likely have tested it.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/