linux-kernel - Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52E8CC03.7080207@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:38:11 +0200
From:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To:	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
CC:	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	<pavel@....cz>, <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>, <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

On 2014-01-29 11:29, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 29.01.2014 11:10, Tero Kristo wrote:
> 
>>
>> It looks like the omap36xx version of the omap96m_alwon_fck is modelled
>> improperly in the dts files. I don't have access to omap36xx hardware
>> myself, but give a try for the following patch:
>>
>>
> 
> It could be that 36xx omap96m_alwon_fck clock is wrongly modeled, but I
> am testing on 1) 3430es2 (Nokia N900) and 2) legacy boot, so I guess
> that patch won't help much (unless I am missing something and DT is used
> even with legacy boot and 36xx clocks are used on 3430es2)

I think Tero's reply was to Christoph. I believe the issues you see and
what Christoph sees are totally different.

 Tomi



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (902 bytes)