lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1390994505.5023.32.camel@mars>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:21:45 +0100
From:	Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>
To:	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pali.rohar@...il.com, pavel@....cz,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: OMAP: clock DT conversion issues with omap36xx

On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 18:02 +0100, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 15:40 +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
> > 
> > >> Due to a regression since next-20140122 the following errors are present:
> > >>
> > >>   - pin sys_clkout2, which gets configured to 24 Mhz by the fourth patch
> > >>     in this set, erroneously outputs only 12 Mhz.
> > >>     Just out of curiosity, configuring it to 48 Mhz puts out desired 24 Mhz.
> > >>
> > >>   - omap_dss, which gets configured by the third patch in this set, fails
> > >>     to do 'dss_set_fck_rate(fck);' in
> > >>     drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c:dss_setup_default_clock() which leads to:
> > >>
> > >>      | omapdss_dss: probe of omapdss_dss failed with error -22
> > >>      | omapdss CORE error: Failed to initialize DSS platform driver
> > >>      | panel-dpi panel-dpi.0: failed to find video source 'dpi.0
> > >>
> > >>    Both regressions seem to have something to do with the clock framework.
> > >>    Could this be related to the DT clock conversion patches?
> > >
> > 
> > Yea its definitely possible, as the clock DT conversion touches pretty 
> > much everything. Have you tried whether this works properly with legacy 
> > boot? Personally I don't have access to any omap3 devices that would 
> > have display and have no possibility to check this out myself. Anyway, 
> > my initial guess is that some clock divider setup might be wrong with 
> > omap3, or we are missing some ti,set-rate-parent flag for some clock 
> > node which prevents escalating clk_set_rate properly. However, it should 
> > be easy to debug this by looking at the clock node in question, and its 
> > parent nodes to see if there are any problems.
> 
> Currently I only analyzed sys_clkout2 (see attachments for full
> clk_summary files):
> 
> clk_summary__next-20140115__works_as_expected:
>              dpll4_m2_ck        1           1            96000000
>                 dpll4_m2x2_ck   1           1            96000000
>                    omap_192m_alwon_fck 1           1            96000000
>                       omap_96m_alwon_fck 1           2            96000000
>                          per_96m_fck 0           6            96000000
>                             mcbsp4_fck 0           1            96000000
>                             mcbsp3_fck 0           2            96000000
>                             mcbsp2_fck 0           2            96000000
>                          cm_96m_fck 2           3            96000000
>                             clkout2_src_ck 1           1            96000000
>                                sys_clkout2 1           1            24000000
> 
> For real, on pin sys_clkout2 are correctly 24 Mhz measured.
> 
> clk_summary__next-20140124__sysclkout2_dss_fails:
>              dpll4_m2_ck        1           1            96000000
>                 dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck 1           1            192000000
>                    dpll4_m2x2_ck 1           1            192000000
>                       omap_192m_alwon_fck 0           0            192000000
>                       omap_96m_alwon_fck 1           2            192000000
>                          per_96m_fck 0           6            192000000
>                             mcbsp4_fck 0           1            192000000
>                             mcbsp3_fck 0           2            192000000
>                             mcbsp2_fck 0           2            192000000
>                          cm_96m_fck 2           3            192000000
>                             clkout2_src_ck 1           1            192000000
>                                sys_clkout2 1           1            24000000
> 
> For real, on pin sys_clkout2 are only ~12 Mhz measured.
> 
> So I added this patch:
> 
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: fix omap3 clock multiplier for dpll4_m2x2_ck
> 
> Before DT clock conversion, there was no multiplier for dpll4_m2x2_ck.
> So to be compatible again, set dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck multiplier back to 1.
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
> index cb04d4b..b594050 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
>  		#clock-cells = <0>;
>  		compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
>  		clocks = <&dpll4_m2_ck>;
> -		clock-mult = <2>;
> +		clock-mult = <1>;
>  		clock-div = <1>;
>  	};
>
> And it works again. But due to the fact that sys_clkout2 was at 12 Mhz
> instead of 24, shouldn't it have been at 48 caused by "clock-mult = 2 ?

Any ideas on that?

I reverted the patch above and added:

From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:03:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap36xx: fix omap96m_alwon_fck

OMAP36xx has different hardware implementation for the omap96m_alwon_fck
compared to other OMAP3 variants. Reflect this properly in the dts file.

Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
---
  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi |    9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
index 2fcf253..24ddf3f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -88,3 +88,12 @@
  			 <&mcbsp4_ick>, <&uart4_fck>;
  	};
  };
+
+&omap_96m_alwon_fck {
+	compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+	clocks = <&omap_192m_alwon_fck>;
+	ti,bit-shift = <12>;
+	ti,max-div = <2>;
+	reg = <0x0a40>;
+	ti,index-starts-at-one;
+};

But the output of sys_clkout2 is still wrong.

clk_summary__next-20140124__patch_tero_fix_omap96m_alwon_fck
             dpll4_m2_ck        1           1            96000000
                dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck 1           1            192000000
                   dpll4_m2x2_ck 1           1            192000000
                      omap_192m_alwon_fck 1           1            192000000
                         omap_96m_alwon_fck 1           2            192000000
                            per_96m_fck 0           6            192000000
                               mcbsp4_fck 0           1            192000000
                               mcbsp3_fck 0           2            192000000
                               mcbsp2_fck 0           2            192000000
                            cm_96m_fck 2           3            192000000
                               clkout2_src_ck 1           1            192000000
                                  sys_clkout2 1           1            24000000

Thanks
  -- Christoph

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ