linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140129115403.4d2772c096a4fc7a4c9cb156@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:54:03 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs tree got a conflict in
fs/btrfs/acl.c between commit 996a710d4641 ("btrfs: use generic posix ACL
infrastructure") from the  tree and commit cfad95253440 ("btrfs: remove
dead code") from the btrfs tree.

I fixed it up (I used the version from Linus' tree) and can carry the fix
as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped