linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] ipr: Use pci_enable_msi_range() and pci_enable_msix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:26:52 +0100
From:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To:	Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wendy Xiong <wenxiong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] ipr: Use pci_enable_msi_range() and
 pci_enable_msix_range()

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:28:45AM -0600, Brian King wrote:

Thanks for the review, Brian!

> These look like they will conflict with a recent patch to
> the ipr driver:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg71644.html

BTW, this one does not appear ACKed.

> Do you want me to rediff your patches on top of this one,
> or do you want to keep the entire MSI series together
> and do the rediff? Otherwise the patches seem fine.

I would prefer the former.

@Bjorn, please let us know if you prefer otherwise.

> Thanks,
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> -- 
> Brian King
> Power Linux I/O
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> 
> 

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/