[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3683633.QqePEXQehq@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:08:47 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Marc C <marc.ceeeee@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Feng Kan <fkan@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/5] Documentation: power: reset: Add documentation for generic SYSCON reboot driver
On Friday 24 January 2014 15:16:32 Marc C wrote:
>
> > What's wrong with having a system clock unit binding, that the kernel
> > can decompose as appropriate?
>
> From what I understand, the arm-soc maintainers want to reduce (and perhaps even
> eliminate) these board-specific constructs, and try to utilize common driver-code that
> resides in the "driver" folder. I can vouch for the syscon/regmap framework as something
> which would enable the effort.
While your statement is true in general, it doesn't seem to counter
what Mark R said above.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists