[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1401290956060.23856@nuc>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:57:33 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Ben Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: ensure locality of task_struct allocations
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> In the presence of memoryless nodes, numa_node_id()/cpu_to_node() will
> return the current CPU's NUMA node, but that may not be where we expect
> to allocate from memory from. Instead, we should use
> numa_mem_id()/cpu_to_mem(). On one ppc64 system with a memoryless Node
> 0, this ends up saving nearly 500M of slab due to less fragmentation.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists