linux-kernel - [PATCH 00/17] x86, ia64 NUMA cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140129174106.15476.7075.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:17:25 -0700
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/17] x86, ia64 NUMA cleanup

This is all cleanup: it adds no new functionality and should make no
functional difference at all except a printk change or two.

The main ideas are:

  - Clean up the x86 PCI bus scanning interfaces.  We had:
      struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *, int node)
      struct pci_bus *pcibios_scan_root(int bus)
      struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int bus)
      void pcibios_scan_specific_bus(int bus)
    These were all basically the same, so I kept only pcibios_scan_root().

  - Get rid of mp_bus_to_node[].  This was basically a way of passing node
    info from the AMD "native host bridg driver" (amd_bus.c) into the PCI
    core.  It was clunky and inconsistent between x86-64 and i386.  I
    replaced it with x86_pci_root_bus_node(), analogous to the existing
    x86_pci_root_bus_resources().

  - Remove _PXM knowledge from the PCI host bridge, IOMMU, and APIC code.
    They really only care about the NUMA node number, not the raw _PXM
    value.

---

Bjorn Helgaas (17):
      x86/PCI: Drop pcibios_scan_root() check for bus already scanned
      x86/PCI: Use pcibios_scan_root() instead of pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata()
      x86/PCI: Use pcibios_scan_root() instead of pci_scan_bus_on_node()
      x86/PCI: Merge pci_scan_bus_on_node() into pcibios_scan_root()
      x86/PCI: Drop return value of pcibios_scan_root()
      x86/PCI: Add x86_pci_root_bus_node() to look up NUMA node from PCI bus
      x86/PCI: Use x86_pci_root_bus_node() instead of get_mp_bus_to_node()
      x86/PCI: Remove mp_bus_to_node[], set_mp_bus_to_node(), get_mp_bus_to_node()
      x86/PCI: Remove unnecessary list_empty(&pci_root_infos) check
      x86/PCI: Use NUMA_NO_NODE, not -1, for unknown node
      x86/PCI: Remove acpi_get_pxm() usage
      ia64 / sba_iommu: Use NUMA_NO_NODE, not MAX_NUMNODES, for unknown node
      ia64: Remove acpi_get_pxm() usage
      ACPI / numa: Fix acpi_get_node() prototype
      ACPI / numa: Simplify acpi_get_node() style
      ACPI / numa: Make __acpi_map_pxm_to_node(), acpi_get_pxm() static
      ACPI / numa: Use __weak, not the gcc-specific version


 arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c |   32 +++-------
 arch/ia64/include/asm/pci.h     |    2 -
 arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c         |   28 ++-------
 arch/ia64/pci/pci.c             |   10 +--
 arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h      |    7 --
 arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h |   14 ----
 arch/x86/pci/acpi.c             |   29 ++-------
 arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c          |   10 ---
 arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c         |   13 +++-
 arch/x86/pci/common.c           |  128 +++++----------------------------------
 arch/x86/pci/fixup.c            |    6 +-
 arch/x86/pci/irq.c              |    6 --
 arch/x86/pci/legacy.c           |    4 -
 arch/x86/pci/numaq_32.c         |    6 +-
 arch/x86/pci/visws.c            |    4 +
 drivers/acpi/numa.c             |   16 ++---
 include/acpi/acpi_numa.h        |    1 
 include/linux/acpi.h            |    9 +--
 18 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/