[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1401291526320.1652@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:31:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] idle: move the cpuidle entry point to the generic
idle loop
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> In order to integrate cpuidle with the scheduler, we must have a better
> proximity in the core code with what cpuidle is doing and not delegate
> such interaction to arch code.
>
> Architectures implementing arch_cpu_idle() should simply enter
> a cheap idle mode in the absence of a proper cpuidle driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
As mentioned in my reply to Olof's comment on patch #5/6, here's a new
version of this patch adding the safety local_irq_enable() to the core
code.
----- >8
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Subject: idle: move the cpuidle entry point to the generic idle loop
In order to integrate cpuidle with the scheduler, we must have a better
proximity in the core code with what cpuidle is doing and not delegate
such interaction to arch code.
Architectures implementing arch_cpu_idle() should simply enter
a cheap idle mode in the absence of a proper cpuidle driver.
In both cases i.e. whether it is a cpuidle driver or the default
arch_cpu_idle(), the calling convention expects IRQs to be disabled
on entry and enabled on exit. There is a warning in place already but
let's add a forced IRQ enable here as well. This will allow for
removing the forced IRQ enable some implementations do locally and
allowing for the warning to trig.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
diff --git a/kernel/cpu/idle.c b/kernel/cpu/idle.c
index 988573a9a3..14ca43430a 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu/idle.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/stackprotector.h>
@@ -95,8 +96,10 @@ static void cpu_idle_loop(void)
if (!current_clr_polling_and_test()) {
stop_critical_timings();
rcu_idle_enter();
- arch_cpu_idle();
- WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled());
+ if (cpuidle_idle_call())
+ arch_cpu_idle();
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled()))
+ local_irq_enable();
rcu_idle_exit();
start_critical_timings();
} else {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists