[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1391077695.26079.78.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:16 +0000
From: "Woodhouse, David" <david.woodhouse@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/build] x86, boot: Fix word-size assumptions in
has_eflag () inline asm
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 10:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> This broke the build though:
>
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/../cpuflags.c: Assembler messages:
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/../cpuflags.c:35: Error: invalid instruction
> suffix for `pushf'
Ah, that only happens with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE, so I missed the fact
that 64-bit code was using the *same* inline asm. Sorry.
That 'pushfl' really does want to be 'pushfq' for the 64-bit version.
I'll look at how best to make it do the right thing...
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (4370 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists