linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] spi: rspi: Add DT support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140130112558.GJ22609@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:25:58 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] spi: rspi: Add DT support

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 08:10:34PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > well?

> As there were no code changes in v5 of "spi: rspi: Add DT support",
> Patch "[14/14] spi: rspi: Add support for Quad and Dual SPI Transfers on QSPI"
> should still apply fine.

> Do you want me to resubmit?

I see you did actually resend before I saw this but yes, in general it's
better to resend stuff.  If you start applying version X of one patch
with version Y of another it's more work and there's a lot of things
that can go wrong between user error and unexpected dependencies.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)