[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401291628340.22974@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:35:36 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, oom: base root bonus on current usage
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This changelog has deteriorated :( We should provide sufficient info so
> that people will be able to determine whether this patch will fix a
> problem they or their customers are observing. And so that people who
> maintain -stable and its derivatives can decide whether to backport it.
>
> I went back and stole some text from the v1 patch. Please review the
> result. The changelog would be even better if it were to describe the
> new behaviour under the problematic workloads.
>
The new changelog looks fine with the exception of the mention of sshd
which typically sets itself to be disabled from oom killing altogether.
> We don't think -stable needs this?
>
Nobody has reported it in over three years as causing an issue, probably
because people typically have enough memory that oom kills don't come from
a ton of small processes allocating memory that can't be reclaimed,
there's usually at least one large process to kill.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists