| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:45:07 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] sched: Push down pre_schedule() and idle_balance()
On 28 January 2014 18:16, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> This patch both merged idle_balance() and pre_schedule() and pushes
> both of them into pick_next_task().
>
> Conceptually pre_schedule() and idle_balance() are rather similar,
> both are used to pull more work onto the current CPU.
>
> We cannot however first move idle_balance() into pre_schedule_fair()
> since there is no guarantee the last runnable task is a fair task, and
> thus we would miss newidle balances.
>
> Similarly, the dl and rt pre_schedule calls must be ran before
> idle_balance() since their respective tasks have higher priority and
> it would not do to delay their execution searching for less important
> tasks first.
>
> However, by noticing that pick_next_tasks() already traverses the
> sched_class hierarchy in the right order, we can get the right
> behaviour and do away with both calls.
>
> We must however change the special case optimization to also require
> that prev is of sched_class_fair, otherwise we can miss doing a dl or
> rt pull where we needed one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 26 ++------------------------
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 15 +++++++--------
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> kernel/sched/idle_task.c | 12 +++++-------
> kernel/sched/rt.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 -
> 6 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2146,13 +2146,6 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> -/* assumes rq->lock is held */
> -static inline void pre_schedule(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> -{
> - if (prev->sched_class->pre_schedule)
> - prev->sched_class->pre_schedule(rq, prev);
> -}
> -
> /* rq->lock is NOT held, but preemption is disabled */
> static inline void post_schedule(struct rq *rq)
> {
> @@ -2170,10 +2163,6 @@ static inline void post_schedule(struct
>
> #else
>
> -static inline void pre_schedule(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> -{
> -}
> -
> static inline void post_schedule(struct rq *rq)
> {
> }
> @@ -2569,7 +2558,8 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct tas
> * Optimization: we know that if all tasks are in
> * the fair class we can call that function directly:
> */
> - if (likely(rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.h_nr_running)) {
> + if (likely(prev->sched_class == &fair_sched_class &&
> + rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.h_nr_running)) {
> p = fair_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, prev);
> if (likely(p))
> return p;
> @@ -2672,18 +2662,6 @@ static void __sched __schedule(void)
> switch_count = &prev->nvcsw;
> }
>
> - pre_schedule(rq, prev);
> -
> - if (unlikely(!rq->nr_running)) {
> - /*
> - * We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such
> - * that we measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
> - */
> - rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(rq);
> - if (idle_balance(rq))
> - rq->idle_stamp = 0;
> - }
> -
> if (prev->on_rq || rq->skip_clock_update < 0)
> update_rq_clock(rq);
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -989,6 +989,8 @@ static struct sched_dl_entity *pick_next
> return rb_entry(left, struct sched_dl_entity, rb_node);
> }
>
> +static int pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_rq);
> +
> struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> {
> struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se;
> @@ -997,6 +999,11 @@ struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(st
>
> dl_rq = &rq->dl;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + if (dl_task(prev))
> + pull_dl_task(rq);
> +#endif
> +
> if (unlikely(!dl_rq->dl_nr_running))
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -1427,13 +1434,6 @@ static int pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void pre_schedule_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> -{
> - /* Try to pull other tasks here */
> - if (dl_task(prev))
> - pull_dl_task(rq);
> -}
> -
> static void post_schedule_dl(struct rq *rq)
> {
> push_dl_tasks(rq);
> @@ -1626,7 +1626,6 @@ const struct sched_class dl_sched_class
> .set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_dl,
> .rq_online = rq_online_dl,
> .rq_offline = rq_offline_dl,
> - .pre_schedule = pre_schedule_dl,
> .post_schedule = post_schedule_dl,
> .task_woken = task_woken_dl,
> #endif
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2581,7 +2581,8 @@ void idle_exit_fair(struct rq *this_rq)
> update_rq_runnable_avg(this_rq, 0);
> }
>
> -#else
> +#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
> +
> static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se,
> int update_cfs_rq) {}
> static inline void update_rq_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq, int runnable) {}
> @@ -2593,7 +2594,7 @@ static inline void dequeue_entity_load_a
> int sleep) {}
> static inline void update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> int force_update) {}
> -#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> static void enqueue_sleeper(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> @@ -4686,9 +4687,10 @@ pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struc
> struct sched_entity *se;
> struct task_struct *p;
>
> +again:
> #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> if (!cfs_rq->nr_running)
> - return NULL;
> + goto idle;
>
> if (prev->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
> goto simple;
> @@ -4764,7 +4766,7 @@ pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struc
> #endif
>
> if (!cfs_rq->nr_running)
> - return NULL;
> + goto idle;
>
> prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
>
> @@ -4780,6 +4782,20 @@ pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struc
> hrtick_start_fair(rq, p);
>
> return p;
> +
> +idle:
> + idle_exit_fair(rq);
It should be idle_enter_fair.
we want to update the statistic with the running time of other classes
than CFS.
The use case is:
exit idle
put_prev_task_idle
--> idle_exit_fair (account elapsed idle time)
pick_next_task other than fair tasks
switch between "other than fair" tasks
...
no more "other than fair" tasks to schedule
pick_next_task_fair
--> no fair task on the rq
--> jump to simple
--> idle_enter_fair (account elapsed running time of other class
before trying to pull fair task from other CPUs)
--> idle_balance()
...
Vincent
> + /*
> + * We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such that we
> + * measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
> + */
> + rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(rq);
> + if (idle_balance(rq)) { /* drops rq->lock */
> + rq->idle_stamp = 0;
> + goto again;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> /*
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle_task.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle_task.c
> @@ -13,13 +13,8 @@ select_task_rq_idle(struct task_struct *
> {
> return task_cpu(p); /* IDLE tasks as never migrated */
> }
> -
> -static void pre_schedule_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> -{
> - idle_exit_fair(rq);
> - rq_last_tick_reset(rq);
> -}
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> +
> /*
> * Idle tasks are unconditionally rescheduled:
> */
> @@ -55,6 +50,10 @@ dequeue_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct
>
> static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + idle_exit_fair(rq);
> + rq_last_tick_reset(rq);
> +#endif
> }
>
> static void task_tick_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int queued)
> @@ -98,7 +97,6 @@ const struct sched_class idle_sched_clas
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_idle,
> - .pre_schedule = pre_schedule_idle,
> #endif
>
> .set_curr_task = set_curr_task_idle,
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -1324,12 +1324,20 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_ta
> return p;
> }
>
> +static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq);
> +
> static struct task_struct *
> pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> {
> struct task_struct *p;
> struct rt_rq *rt_rq = &rq->rt;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + /* Try to pull RT tasks here if we lower this rq's prio */
> + if (rq->rt.highest_prio.curr > prev->prio)
> + pull_rt_task(rq);
> +#endif
> +
> if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -1720,13 +1728,6 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void pre_schedule_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> -{
> - /* Try to pull RT tasks here if we lower this rq's prio */
> - if (rq->rt.highest_prio.curr > prev->prio)
> - pull_rt_task(rq);
> -}
> -
> static void post_schedule_rt(struct rq *rq)
> {
> push_rt_tasks(rq);
> @@ -2003,7 +2004,6 @@ const struct sched_class rt_sched_class
> .set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_rt,
> .rq_online = rq_online_rt,
> .rq_offline = rq_offline_rt,
> - .pre_schedule = pre_schedule_rt,
> .post_schedule = post_schedule_rt,
> .task_woken = task_woken_rt,
> .switched_from = switched_from_rt,
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1136,7 +1136,6 @@ struct sched_class {
> int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int task_cpu, int sd_flag, int flags);
> void (*migrate_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int next_cpu);
>
> - void (*pre_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
> void (*post_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq);
> void (*task_waking) (struct task_struct *task);
> void (*task_woken) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists