[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1401300830340.1652@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:31:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] setting the table for integration of cpuidle with
the scheduler
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:45:07PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > As everyone should know by now, we want to integrate the cpuidle
> > governor with the scheduler for a more efficient idling of CPUs.
> > In order to help the transition, this small patch series moves the
> > existing interaction with cpuidle from architecture code to generic
> > core code. The ARM, PPC, SH and X86 architectures are concerned.
> > No functional change should have occurred yet.
> >
> > @peterz: Are you willing to pick up those patches?
>
> Yeah.. no objections. Should I pick these up or will you be sending
> another round?
I think you could pick them now, taking care of picking up the amended
#1/6.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists