[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52EA58F4.8070601@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:51:48 +0200
From: Terje Bergström <tbergstrom@...dia.com>
To: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@...il.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu: host1x: do not check previously handled gathers
On 07.01.2014 22:03, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> When patching gathers, we don't need to check against
> gathers with lower indices than the current one, as
> they are guaranteed to already have been handled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Here's a trivial optimization I have been running with for a while.
>
> drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c
> index de5ec33..e965805 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c
> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ int host1x_job_pin(struct host1x_job *job, struct device *dev)
>
> g->base = job->gather_addr_phys[i];
>
> - for (j = 0; j < job->num_gathers; j++)
> + for (j = i + 1; j < job->num_gathers; j++)
> if (job->gathers[j].bo == g->bo)
> job->gathers[j].handled = true;
>
Hi,
Thanks. This looks good logically, and I ran some tests that agree.
Acked-By: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@...dia.com>
Terje
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists