[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52EA71F8.7070308@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:38:32 -0500
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
Alexander Fyodorov <halcy@...dex.ru>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke <thavatchai.makpahibulchoke@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
On 01/30/2014 03:55 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 01/28/2014 11:49 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>> v2->v3:
>> - Simplify the code by using numerous mode only without an unfair
>> option.
>> - Use the latest smp_load_acquire()/smp_store_release() barriers.
>> - Move the queue spinlock code to kernel/locking.
>> - Make the use of queue spinlock the default for x86-64 without user
>> configuration.
>> - Additional performance tuning.
>>
>
> Could you please point me to any dependency patches I am missing?
> I am getting the compilation error (latest linus tree with
> 9b0cd304f26b9fca140de15deeac2bf357d1f388)
>
> Got something like below
>
> make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> CHK include/config/kernel.release
> CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
> CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
> make[1]: Nothing to be done for `relocs'.
> CC kernel/bounds.s
> In file included from include/asm-generic/getorder.h:7:0,
> from /test/master/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h:71,
> from /test/master/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:17,
> from /test/master/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:6,
> from include/linux/atomic.h:4,
> from include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:22,
> from
> /test/master/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock_types.h:15,
> from
> /test/master/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h:331,
> from /test/master/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h:65,
> from /test/master/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h:8,
> from /test/master/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:16,
> from include/linux/bitops.h:33,
> from include/linux/kernel.h:10,
> from include/asm-generic/bug.h:13,
> from /test/master/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:38,
> from include/linux/bug.h:4,
> from include/linux/page-flags.h:9,
> from kernel/bounds.c:9:
> include/linux/log2.h: In function ‘__ilog2_u32’:
> include/linux/log2.h:34:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘fls’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> include/linux/log2.h: In function ‘__ilog2_u64’:
> include/linux/log2.h:42:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘fls64’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> include/linux/log2.h: In function ‘__roundup_pow_of_two’:
> .
> .
> [trimmed]
>
The code will need to be compiled in either the latest linux tree as the
patches have dependency on some new memory barrier that are in 3.14.
Alternatively, you can compile with the latest tip tree.
If you have already done that, please send me your config file so that I
can reproduce the compilation error in my build environment.
Thanks,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists