lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:15:30 -0800
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzalez@...ets.cl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, hugetlb: gimme back my page

On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 10:59 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 29-01-14 22:37:03, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
> > 
> > While testing some changes, I noticed an issue triggered by the libhugetlbfs
> > test-suite. This is caused by commit 309381fe (mm: dump page when hitting a
> > VM_BUG_ON using VM_BUG_ON_PAGE), where an application can unexpectedly OOM due
> > to another program that using, or reserving, pool_size-1 pages later triggers
> > a VM_BUG_ON_PAGE and thus greedly leaves no memory to the rest of the hugetlb
> > aware tasks. For example, in libhugetlbfs 2.14:
> > 
> > mmap-gettest 10 32783 (2M: 64): <---- hit VM_BUG_ON_PAGE
> > mmap-cow 32782 32783 (2M: 32):  FAIL    Failed to create shared mapping: Cannot allocate memory
> > mmap-cow 32782 32783 (2M: 64):  FAIL    Failed to create shared mapping: Cannot allocate memory
> > 
> > While I have not looked into why 'mmap-gettest' keeps failing, it is of no
> > importance to this particular issue. This problem is similar to why we have
> > the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex, hugepages are quite finite.
> > 
> > Revert the use of VM_BUG_ON_PAGE back to just VM_BUG_ON.
> 
> I do not understand what VM_BUG_ON_PAGE has to do with the above
> failure. Could you be more specific.
> 
> Hmm, now that I am looking into dump_page_badflags it shouldn't call
> mem_cgroup_print_bad_page for hugetlb pages because it doesn't make any
> sense. I will post a patch for that but that still doesn't explain the
> above changelog.

Yeah, I then looked closer at it and realized it doesn't make much
sense. I don't know why I thought a new page was being used. In any
case, bisection still shows the commit in question as the cause of the
regression. I will continue looking into it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ