[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1401301433320.1652@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:39:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] cpuidle: split cpuidle_idle_call main function
into functions
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> /**
> + * cpuidle_select - ask the cpuidle framework to choose an idle state
> + *
> + * @drv: the cpuidle driver
> + * @dev: the cpuidle device
> + *
> + * Returns the index of the idle state. On error it returns:
> + * -NODEV : the cpuidle framework is available
s/available/not available/
> + * -EBUSY : the cpuidle framework is not initialized
> + */
> +int cpuidle_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> +{
> + if (off || !initialized)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (!drv || !dev || !dev->enabled)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + return cpuidle_curr_governor->select(drv, dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpuidle_select);
Peterz comment notwithstanding, is there actually a need to export those
symbols? No modules should ever need to use this given this is going to
be called by the scheduler code.
Ditto for the other symbols.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists