[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPtuhTgAF7u-yZi3OpmAPikhp25nu+ooqEQXbJELVKTkAaJh4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:47:15 -0800
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with Linus' tree
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/clk/Makefile between commit fd3fdaf09f26 ("clk: sort Makefile")
>> from Linus' tree and commit 7ee2c5117483 ("clk: bcm281xx: add initial
>> clock framework support") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> Ugh. Looks like some last minute cleanup stuff went into clk-next
> that didn't spend time in linux-next, and now causes conflicts with
> some clk stuff we still have queued in arm-soc (ack'd by Mike.)
>
> Now, based on the Hulk's response to Mike's pull request, if we submit
> this, introducing yet more conflicts in the Makefile, it will surely
> be Hulk angry, Hulk smash.
Well this is clearly my fault. Please place appropriate blame on me
for sneaking in that Makefile cleanup.
/me prepares to be smashed.
Regards,
Mike
>
> Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists