linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] afs: proc cells and rootcell are writeable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140130223625.GA27875@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:36:25 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] afs: proc cells and rootcell are writeable

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:27:15PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
 > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> wrote:
 > >
 > > In afs documentation is written that you need to write to these files. See:
 > 
 > Well, but the afs documentation is clearly wrong, since the
 > "documented" procedure doesn't actually *work*.
 > 
 > So I don't think "it's documented" is a very strong argument.
 > Documentation is as useful as used toilet paper, if clearly nobody has
 > ever done what was "documented".

Don't most (all?) of the people actually using AFS use some out-of-tree thing instead ?

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/