[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1401301805590.19506@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:10:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, James Bottomley wrote:
> Why is this? the whole reason for CONFIG_LBDAF is supposed to be to
> allow 64 bit offsets for block devices on 32 bit. It sounds like
> there's somewhere not using sector_t ... or using it wrongly which needs
> fixing.
The page cache uses unsigned long as a page index. Therefore, if unsigned
long is 32-bit, the block device may have at most 2^32-1 pages.
> > On 32-bit architectures, we must limit block device size to
> > PAGE_SIZE*(2^32-1).
>
> So you're saying CONFIG_LBDAF can never work, why?
>
> James
CONFIG_LBDAF works, but it doesn't allow unlimited capacity: on x86,
without CONFIG_LBDAF, the limit is 2TiB. With CONFIG_LBDAF, the limit is
16TiB (4096*2^32).
Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists