lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52EB78A9.4020306@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:19:21 +0100
From:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/21] pinctrl: mvebu: dove: provide generic mpp callbacks

On 01/31/14 11:13, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
> <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> We want to get rid of passing register addresses to common pinctrl
>> driver, so provide set/get callbacks for generic mpp pins.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
[...]
>> @@ -374,7 +398,7 @@ static struct mvebu_mpp_ctrl dove_mpp_controls[] = {
>>          MPP_FUNC_CTRL(13, 13, "mpp13", dove_pmu_mpp_ctrl),
>>          MPP_FUNC_CTRL(14, 14, "mpp14", dove_pmu_mpp_ctrl),
>>          MPP_FUNC_CTRL(15, 15, "mpp15", dove_pmu_mpp_ctrl),
>> -       MPP_REG_CTRL(16, 23),
>> +       MPP_FUNC_CTRL(16, 23, NULL, dove_mpp_ctrl),
>
> What does this have to do with the rest of the patch?
>
> (Maybe I'm stupid, beware I'm just glancing over this stuff as I
> see the patch set is still in development.)

Not really, the driver is slightly misdesigned and this patches
try to clean this up a bit. I have prepared a v3 branch for the
MVEBU guys to have a look at first.

Short version: Thanks for trying to review this, but I guess your time
would be better spent on a soon to be posted v3.

Long version:
Not having a callback identifies each control as "generic mpp pins",
so by passing a callback we make them "SoC specific" as a preparation
to remove the common "generic mpp" set/get function.

Sebastian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ