[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C9F8415089354E4FB76F4548B3515AF484289B2A@edb1.wapice.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:56:25 +0000
From: Jouko Haapaluoma <jouko.haapaluoma@...ice.com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
CC: Sami Pietikäinen <Sami.Pietikainen@...ice.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"vinod.koul@...el.com" <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: at_hdmac: fix locking according to
slave DMA requirements
Hi
Thanks for the patches. We got the DMA working for now but the tasklet_disable() and tasklet_enable() had to be removed from atc_control().
If the device driver calls dmaengine_terminate_all() from the callback (like in our previous deadlock example), the tasklet_disable() will cause
another deadlock because the tasklet will then wait for itself to close.
The tasklet_disable() seems to be used to ensure that no tasklet is running when terminating the DMA transfers. This prevents the terminate_all from
happening in between the critical sections in the tasklet which are locked with atchan->lock. Maybe the tasklet needs to be implemented so that it can
detect and recover if the terminate_all was called in between the critical sections in the tasklet?
BR,
Jouko Haapaluoma
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists