linux-kernel - Re: That greedy Linux VM cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+sTkh4p10P_BbxEx0vxS9uF0zA9G97K+4B_Q1Np55Ui83LVDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:47:09 +0800
From:	Igor Podlesny <for.poige+linux@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: That greedy Linux VM cache

On 31 January 2014 00:58, Igor Podlesny <for.poige+linux@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
>  While I'm thinking about moving system back to XFS...

   Well, it helped just a bit. The whole picture remains, so it's not
Btrfs' issue, but seemingly Linux VM's one. The problem can be briefly
described as "if allowed to swap (swappiness != 0), VM would rather
start swapping, than reduce cache size which holds ~ 25 % of RAM".
Even more briefly it's stated in the Subject.

   From user's point of view, it looks like the system is being
heavily swapped (and can be easily misinterpreted as it), but actually
the most disk activity is permanent _reading_ from filesystem, and not
accessing swap device.

   Should I fill in a bug report in kernel's bugzilla, or just upgrade
the notebook? )

-- 
End of message. Next message?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/