[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <AED23932-2BC1-463C-BD1C-D86EBC174B8A@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:45:34 -0600
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform
On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Friday 31 January 2014 13:25:25 Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> The hotplug.c change sticks out as something that isn't just a move
>>> of code to another place, but deletion of unused code. It would
>>> be nice to split that out into a separate change, possibly together
>>> with the trivial board.c and smp.c changes.
>>
>> That’s not 100% true, the hotplug.c code implemented msm_cpu_die, which moved into smp.c
>>
>> I can split out scm*/smp* into a patch to enable smp if that is really desired, but not exactly sure what it gets us.
>>
>
> It's not extremely important, I just prefer splitting patches
> that have any kind of functional change from trivial moves.
>
> If something happens to break for an unforseen reason, it's
> easier to bisect to the patch that does the change.
>
> Arnd
I’ll push my change to hotplug.c into the SMP patch set that Stephen started.
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists