[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52EC297B.7080909@ladisch.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:53:47 +0100
From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
To: Network Nut <sillystack@...il.com>
CC: "'Austin S. Hemmelgarn'" <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WaitForMultipleObjects/etc. In Kernel
Network Nut wrote:
>> Assuming that you're porting to mainline distributions (and not embedded
>> devices), named SHM segments are accessible (providing the accessing
>> process has correct permissions) under /dev/shm. You just need to make
>> sure that you create the segment with the right permissions for the
>> other processes to access it.
>
> I already know how to do named shared memory between two processes. I only included that to describe my overall problem.
>
> The problem that I am having is how I can make three totally-independent processes interact:
>
> 1. M is a master process that creates a semaphore.
> 2. P1 is a process that operates against the semaphore.
> 3. P2 is a process that operates against the semaphore.
> 4. It is not permissible that M be responsible for launching P1 or P2.
> 5. The semaphore, one way or another, must allow itself to be specified as one of the synchronization primitives in epoll_wait()
This general problem descripton does not say anything more than your first
mail.
Use eventfd. To share it, use a Unix domain socket created by M. (This
socket must be created at a well-known path. shm_open() works similarly,
but that it creates a file in a RAM disk and mmap()s it is just an
implementation detail.)
Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists