lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGVrzcZwkHSLJxpVsVY_6-VnsuODs0vGKcrcvSBzMEq3GWxqLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:28:10 -0800
From:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of_mdio: Allow the DT to specify the phy ID and avoid autoprobing

2014-01-31 Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 02:24:52PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>> > This is necessary to support phy's that cannot be autoprobed when
>> > of_mdiobus_register is called. Specifically, my case has the phy in reset at
>> > of_mdiobus_register, the reset is only released once the ethernet driver
>> > starts, before it attaches to the phy.
>>
>> Who is responsible for bringing the PHY out of reset, is it the
>> Ethernet/MDIO bus driver? Is the PHY put into reset using, e.g a GPIO
>> line or any sort of reset controller, if so, should not we have some
>> sort of reset handle node and handle that in a generic manner?
>
> The Phy Reset is connected to a GPIO, and the ethernet driver has code
> to switch the GPIO out of reset. The phy is kept in reset until the
> ethernet device is opened, and Linux is booted with the phy reset
> asserted.
>
>> Is your DTS or DTB hardcoding the PHY id, or are you having your
>> bootloader detect the exact PHY for you, then putting back the PHY
>> into reset to save power, until someone uses that PHY again?
>
> For our uses the Phy ID is hardcoded. There is only a single part that
> will fit on the board. So the bootloader doesn't touch the phy. If
> there were alternate parts we'd get the part kind from the EEPROM that
> stores the MAC address/etc.
>
>> > +       while (cplen > 0) {
>> > +               if (sscanf(cp, "ethernet-phy-id%4x.%4x", &upper, &lower) == 2) {
>>
>> You might want to guard against 0x0 and 0xffff just in case whoever
>> fills this information in the Device Tree was reading bogus data out
>> of the MDIO bus, otherwise, chances are that the "Generic PHY" driver
>> will be picked up, and it might still not be appropriate for driving
>> your PHY chip.
>
> Having the bootloader read the phy ID just to fill in this compatible
> string isn't really the point. In every normal case I think it makes
> sense to let Linux autoprobe the phy id. The use for this compatible
> string is to defeat the autoprobe for situations where it is not
> appropriate.

This is well understood, I just think there a few different ways to
proceed with your use case here:

- you allow for a compatible string to defeat auto-probing like you just did
- you tell of_mdiobus_register() to look for a reset phandle and have
a reset controller release the PHY from reset before it tries to probe
for it, because doing that could avoid doing the PHY out of reset
sequence in a few dozen Ethernet drivers

The auto-probing bypass logic looks simple enough, and it does not
require burying the reset logic behind a reset controller, which uses
regmap and a few dozens layers down the road to toggle a bit somewhere
in a register, although this might be the desired way to move forward
if we want that to be generalized.

Anyway:

Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ