linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] net: ethoc: don't advertise gigabit speed on attached PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMo8BfKkZOhsXBXWXS5scc5zN6qQnvk51HOCxAJmDWW19wFM-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:07:06 +0400
From:	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
To:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:	Marc Gauthier <marc@...ence.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
	"linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] net: ethoc: don't advertise gigabit speed on
 attached PHY

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 28, 2014 11:01 PM, "Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Max,
>>> >
>>> > Le 28/01/2014 22:00, Max Filippov a écrit :
>>> >
>>> >> OpenCores 10/100 Mbps MAC does not support speeds above 100 Mbps, but
>>> >> does
>>> >> not disable advertisement when PHY supports them. This results in
>>> >> non-functioning network when the MAC is connected to a gigabit PHY
>>> >> connected
>>> >> to a gigabit switch.
>>> >>
>>> >> The fix is to disable gigabit speed advertisement on attached PHY
>>> >> unconditionally.
>>> >>
>>> >> Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
>>> >> ---
>>> >> Changes v1->v2:
>>> >> - disable both gigabit advertisement and support.
>>> >>
>>> >>   drivers/net/ethernet/ethoc.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> >>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>> >>
>>> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ethoc.c
>>> >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ethoc.c
>>> >> index 4de8cfd..5643b2d 100644
>>> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ethoc.c
>>> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ethoc.c
>>> >> @@ -688,6 +688,14 @@ static int ethoc_mdio_probe(struct net_device
>>> >> *dev)
>>> >>         }
>>> >>
>>> >>         priv->phy = phy;
>>> >> +       phy_update_advert(phy,
>>> >> +                         ADVERTISED_1000baseT_Full |
>>> >> +                         ADVERTISED_1000baseT_Half, 0);
>>> >> +       phy_start_aneg(phy);
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > This does not look necessary, you should not have to call
>>> > phy_start_aneg()
>>> > because the PHY state machine is not yet started, at best this calls
>>> > does
>>> > nothing.
>>>
>>> This call actually makes the whole thing work, because otherwise once
>>> gigabit
>>> support is cleared from the supported mask genphy_config_advert does not
>>> update gigabit advertisement register, leaving it enabled.
>>
>> OK, then we need to figure out what is wrong with ethoc since this is
>> unusual.
>
> Maybe they boot up with gigabit advertisement disabled in their PHY
> and thus they don't see the problem?
>
>> Other drivers do the following:
>>
>> - connect to the PHY
>> - phydev->supported = PHY_BASIC_FEATURES
>> - phydev->advertising &= phydev->supported
>> - start the PHY state machine
>>
>> And they work just fine. Is the PHY driver you are bound to the "Generic
>> PHY" or something else which does something funky in config_aneg()?
>
> It's marvell 88E1111 from the KC-705 board, but the behaviour doesn't
> change if I disable it and the generic phy is used.

Florian,

I don't see how the generic genphy_config_advert can ever change
gigabit advertisement if phydev->supported has gigabit speeds masked
off. So I'm pretty sure that other 10/100 cards would exhibit the same
issue if their PHY started with gigabit advertisement enabled. Maybe
we need to fix those other drivers? Or maybe we need to track what
PHY really supports vs. what we report it supports, so that gigabit
advertisement could be changed even when the PHY no longer
appears to support gigabit?

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/