[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402011546040.4865@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:46:18 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] x86: fix the initialization of physnode_map
On Sat, 1 Feb 2014, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> With DISCONTIGMEM, the mapping between a pfn and its owning node is
> initialized using data provided by the BIOS. However, the initialization
> may fail if the extents are not aligned to section boundary (64M).
>
> The symptom of this bug is an early boot failure in pfn_to_page(),
> as it tries to access NODE_DATA(__nid) using index from an unitialized
> element of the physnode_map[] array.
>
> While the bug is always present, it is more likely to be hit in kdump
> kernels on large machines, because:
>
> 1. The memory map for a kdump kernel is specified as exactmap, and
> exactmap is more likely to be unaligned.
>
> 2. Large reservations are more likely to span across a 64M boundary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists