[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201402010628.04324.marex@denx.de>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 06:28:04 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Matt Porter <matt.porter@...aro.org>,
Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: Add AS3935 lightning sensor support
On Saturday, February 01, 2014 at 06:03:22 AM, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> Duly noted. Will be fixed in the next rev... mutexs are pointless as you
> say.. only corner case would be if you were changing gain_boost and a event
> came in at the same time. But that wouldn't harm anything except slightly
> delay the gain_boost being updated by some x microseconds.
Please stop top-posting ;-)
btw I think you might need a mutex around the entire:
+static void calibrate_as3935(struct as3935_state *st)
+{
+ /* mask disturber interrupt bit */
+ as3935_write(st, AS3935_INT, 1 << 5);
+
+ as3935_write(st, AS3935_CALIBRATE, 0x96);
+ as3935_write(st, AS3935_TUNE_CAP, 1 << 5 | st->tune_cap);
+
+ mdelay(2);
+ as3935_write(st, AS3935_TUNE_CAP, st->tune_cap);
+}
and similar functions where you do a bunch of register accesses. This is because
you probably want to protect them against concurent execution so the chip won't
be confused if a user were to poke something via SYSFS twice.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists