lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 1 Feb 2014 06:28:04 +0100
From:	Marek Vasut <>
To:	Matt Ranostay <>
	Matt Porter <>,
	Koen Kooi <>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <>,
	Mark Brown <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: Add AS3935 lightning sensor support

On Saturday, February 01, 2014 at 06:03:22 AM, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> Duly noted. Will be fixed in the next rev... mutexs are pointless as you
> say.. only corner case would be if you were changing gain_boost and a event
> came in at the same time. But that wouldn't harm anything except slightly
> delay the gain_boost being updated by some  x microseconds.

Please stop top-posting ;-)

btw I think you might need a mutex around the entire:

+static void calibrate_as3935(struct as3935_state *st)
+       /* mask disturber interrupt bit */
+       as3935_write(st, AS3935_INT, 1 << 5);
+       as3935_write(st, AS3935_CALIBRATE, 0x96);
+       as3935_write(st, AS3935_TUNE_CAP, 1 << 5 | st->tune_cap);
+       mdelay(2);
+       as3935_write(st, AS3935_TUNE_CAP, st->tune_cap);

and similar functions where you do a bunch of register accesses. This is because 
you probably want to protect them against concurent execution so the chip won't 
be confused if a user were to poke something via SYSFS twice.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists