[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1391266284.964.1.camel@wall-e.seibold.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:51:24 +0100
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, aarcange@...hat.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
luto@...capital.net, xemul@...allels.com, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, Martin.Runge@...de-schwarz.com,
Andreas.Brief@...de-schwarz.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Make vsyscall_gtod_data handling x86 generic
Am Donnerstag, den 30.01.2014, 16:10 -0800 schrieb Andi Kleen:
> > @@ -1335,7 +1335,6 @@ config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
> >
> > config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT
> > def_bool y
> > - depends on X86_64
>
> Is that really needed? Why does the vdso need sparsemem?
>
No, it is from the previous patch. I will fix it.
> >
> > static inline void __user *arch_compat_alloc_user_space(long len)
> > {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> > + struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> > + return (void __user *)regs->sp - len;
> > +#else
> > compat_uptr_t sp;
>
> and that? why does a vdso need to allocate things on the user page?
>
Will also fixed, compat.h will not longer include by vsyscall_gtod.c.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists