linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] drm/i2c: tda998x: check more I/O errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140202183000.1cf9ca9c@armhf>
Date:	Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:30:00 +0100
From:	Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] drm/i2c: tda998x: check more I/O errors

On Sun, 2 Feb 2014 16:20:58 +0000
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 06:14:45PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > This patch adds more error checking inn I2C I/O functions.
> > In case of I/O error, this permits to avoid writing in bad controller
> > pages, a bad chipset detection or looping when getting the EDID.
> 
> I've just looked at this again, and spotted something:
> 
> > -static uint8_t
> > +static int
> >  reg_read(struct tda998x_priv *priv, uint16_t reg)
> >  {
> >  	uint8_t val = 0;
> > -	reg_read_range(priv, reg, &val, sizeof(val));
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = reg_read_range(priv, reg, &val, sizeof(val));
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> 
> So yes, this can return negative numbers.
> 
> > @@ -1158,8 +1184,11 @@ tda998x_encoder_init(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  	tda998x_reset(priv);
> >  
> >  	/* read version: */
> > -	priv->rev = reg_read(priv, REG_VERSION_LSB) |
> > -			reg_read(priv, REG_VERSION_MSB) << 8;
> > +	ret = reg_read(priv, REG_VERSION_LSB) |
> > +		(reg_read(priv, REG_VERSION_MSB) << 8);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		goto fail;
> > +	priv->rev = ret;
> 
> Two issues here:
> 
> 1. The additional parens are /really/ not required.
> 2. What if reg_read(priv, REG_VERSION_MSB) returns a negative number?
> 
> If we're going to the extent of attempting to make the read/write
> functions return errors, we should at least handle errors generated
> by them properly, otherwise it's pointless making them return errors.
> 
> 	ret = reg_read(priv, REG_VERSION_LSB);
> 	if (ret < 0)
> 		goto fail;
> 
> 	priv->rev = ret;
> 
> 	ret = reg_read(priv, REG_VERSION_MSB);
> 	if (ret < 0)
> 		goto fail;
> 
> 	priv->rev |= ret << 8;
> 
> If you want it to look slightly nicer:
> 
> 	int rev_lo, rev_hi;
> 
> 	rev_lo = reg_read(priv, REG_VERSION_LSB);
> 	rev_hi = reg_read(priv, REG_VERSION_MSB);
> 	if (rev_lo < 0 || rev_hi < 0) {
> 		ret = rev_lo < 0 ? rev_lo : rev_hi;
> 		goto fail;
> 	}
> 
> 	priv->rev = rev_lo | rev_hi << 8;
> 
> I'm happy to commit such a change after this patch to clean it up, or if
> you want to regenerate your patch 2 and post /just/ that incorporating
> this change.

I think that my code works correctly: when there is an error, the
result of reg_read() is minus the error code, and this error code is
always lower than 8388607 (0x7fffff). Then, reg_read() << 8 will always
be negative.

Otherwise, I may redo a patch about the useless parenthesis.

-- 
Ken ar c'hentañ	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/