[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52EF6FCE.8090704@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:30:38 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
CC: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
'Dan Carpenter' <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"andreas.dilger@...el.com" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...hcoding.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"bergwolf@...il.com" <bergwolf@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"oleg.drokin@...el.com" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
"jacques-charles.lafoucriere@....fr"
<jacques-charles.lafoucriere@....fr>,
"jinshan.xiong@...el.com" <jinshan.xiong@...el.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-metag@...r.kernel.org" <linux-metag@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: lustre: include: add "__attribute__((packed))"
for the related union
On 02/03/2014 06:22 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> On 03/02/14 10:05, David Laight wrote:
>> From: Dan Carpenter
>>> On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 09:57:39PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> It seems, our kernel still stick to treate 'pack' region have effect
>>>> with both 'align' and 'sizeof'.
>>>
>>> It's not about packed regions. It's about unions. It's saying the
>>> sizeof() a union is a multiple of 4 unless it's packed.
>>>
>>> union foo {
>>> short x;
>>> short y;
>>> };
>>>
>>> The author intended the sizeof(union foo) to be 2 but on metag arch then
>>> it is 4.
>>
>> The same is probably be true of: struct foo { _u16 bar; };
>
> Yes indeed.
>
>> Architectures that define such alignment rules are a right PITA.
>> You either need to get the size to 2 without using 'packed', or
>> just not define such structures.
>> It is worth seeing if adding aligned(2) will change the size - I'm
>> not sure.
>
> __aligned(2) alone doesn't seem to have any effect on sizeof() or
> __alignof__() unless it is accompanied by __packed. x86_64 is similar in
> that respect (it just packs sanely in the first place).
>
> Combining __packed with __aligned(2) does the trick though (__packed
> alone sets __aligned(1) which is obviously going to be suboptimal).
>
Oh, thank you for your explanation.
And hope this feature issue can be fixed, and satisfy both kernel and
ABI. :-)
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Open, share and attitude like air, water and life which God blessed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists