linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] HID: uHID: implement .raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANq1E4RD0OVTSVOXHPTchop0Y0q0p1_NEZZexSE4kvkp-17TKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Feb 2014 16:26:21 +0100
From:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Frank Praznik <frank.praznik@...rr.com>,
	"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] HID: uHID: implement .raw_request

Hi

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com> wrote:
> It was missing, so adding it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hid/uhid.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/uhid.c b/drivers/hid/uhid.c
> index f5a2b19..438c9f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/uhid.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/uhid.c
> @@ -270,6 +270,22 @@ static int uhid_hid_output_report(struct hid_device *hid, __u8 *buf,
>         return count;
>  }
>
> +static int uhid_raw_request(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned char reportnum,
> +                           __u8 *buf, size_t len, unsigned char rtype,
> +                           int reqtype)
> +{
> +       switch (reqtype) {
> +       case HID_REQ_GET_REPORT:
> +               return uhid_hid_get_raw(hid, reportnum, buf, len, rtype);
> +       case HID_REQ_SET_REPORT:
> +               if (buf[0] != reportnum)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +               return uhid_hid_output_raw(hid, buf, len, rtype);

But that one looks wrong. UHID does not have any SET_REPORT query in
the protocol, yet. You turn a SET_REPORT into an OUTPUT_REPORT here.
So if user-space gets the UHID_OUTPUT event, it doesn't know whether
to send a SET_REPORT@...l to the device, or an async
OUTPUT_REPORT@...r. This at least matters for low-energy BT in bluez,
which uses uhid.

So we'd have to add an UHID_SET_REPORT event. Note that currently
UHID_FEATURE is the equivalent of UHID_GET_REPORT, but just horribly
named..

Thanks
David

> +       default:
> +               return -EIO;
> +       }
> +}
> +
>  static struct hid_ll_driver uhid_hid_driver = {
>         .start = uhid_hid_start,
>         .stop = uhid_hid_stop,
> @@ -277,6 +293,7 @@ static struct hid_ll_driver uhid_hid_driver = {
>         .close = uhid_hid_close,
>         .parse = uhid_hid_parse,
>         .output_report = uhid_hid_output_report,
> +       .raw_request = uhid_raw_request,
>  };
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/