linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140203175405.GL1364@twin.jikos.cz>
Date:	Mon, 3 Feb 2014 18:54:05 +0100
From:	David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:	Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:52:54PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> Chris Mason (3) commits (+64/-32):
>     Btrfs: setup inode location during btrfs_init_inode_locked (+9/-9)
>     Btrfs: don't use ram_bytes for uncompressed inline items (+52/-22)

The patches are CC: stable, but haven't gone through the mailinglist.
Are they still going to be picked by stable?

The commit ids:
90d3e592e99b8e374ead2b45148abf506493a959
514ac8ad8793a097c0c9d89202c642479d6dfa34

but unfortunatelly neither applies directly to anything 3.10+


david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/