[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mwi8x27b.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 13:14:16 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] fat: add fat_fallocate operation
Sorry for long delay.
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:
> + if (mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) {
> + /* First compute the number of clusters to be allocated */
> + mm_bytes = offset + len - round_up(MSDOS_I(inode)->mmu_private,
> + sbi->cluster_size);
This should use ->i_disksize?
[...]
> + /* Release unwritten fallocated blocks on inode eviction. */
> + if (MSDOS_I(inode)->mmu_private < MSDOS_I(inode)->i_disksize) {
> + int err;
> + fat_truncate_blocks(inode, MSDOS_I(inode)->mmu_private);
> + /* Fallocate results in updating the i_start/iogstart
> + * for the zero byte file. So, make it return to
> + * original state during evict and commit it
> + * synchrnously to avoid any corruption on the next
> + * access to the cluster chain for the file.
> + */
> + err = fat_sync_inode(inode);
Ah, good catch. We have to update i_size. I was forgetting about this.
Well, sync inode unconditionally would not be good. Maybe, we better to
use __fat_write_inode() with inode_needs_sync() or such.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists