linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v1] ARM: tegra: add nvidia,wdt-timer-id optional property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <643E69AA4436674C8F39DCC2C05F763863199852CA@HQMAIL03.nvidia.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:59:38 -0800
From:	Andrew Chew <AChew@...dia.com>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:	"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
	"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
	"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	"abrestic@...omium.org" <abrestic@...omium.org>,
	"dgreid@...omium.org" <dgreid@...omium.org>,
	"katierh@...omium.org" <katierh@...omium.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] ARM: tegra: add nvidia,wdt-timer-id optional property

> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 09:46:51PM +0000, Andrew Chew wrote:
> > This optional property can be used to specify which timers are to be
> > used for hardware watchdog timeouts (via a tegra wdt driver).
> 
> Is there any reason that a particular timer should be used?

I worry about colliding with other timer allocations, and wanted to be
flexible in this regard.

> This shouldn't even mention the driver, as the binding should describe the
> HW, not how it's used by Linux at the moment.
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Chew <achew@...dia.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/nvidia,tegra30-timer.txt | 8
> > ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/nvidia,tegra30-timer.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/nvidia,tegra30-timer.txt
> > index b5082a1..e87fa70 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/nvidia,tegra30-timer.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/nvidia,tegra30-timer.txt
> > @@ -13,6 +13,13 @@ Required properties:
> >  - clocks : Must contain one entry, for the module clock.
> >    See ../clocks/clock-bindings.txt for details.
> >
> > +Optional properties:
> > +
> > +- nvidia,wdt-timer-id: A list of timer IDs to be used for watchdogs.
> > +    Watchdog 0 will be assigned to the first timer listed, watchdog 1 will
> > +    be assigned to the second timer listed, etc. up to the number of
> watchdogs
> > +    available.
> 
> This sounds like a description of what software should do. Is there any
> reason this order is important?

The order in regards to which watchdog (watchdog 0, watchdog 1, etc) is paired
with which timer is unimportant for purposes of the watchdog driver that
I will follow up with.  I can leave those details out of the bindings description
if that resolves your concern.

> Also, it feels odd for the proerty name to be singular given it's a list...

You're right.  Given what it is, it really should be nvidia,wdt-timer-ids.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/