linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2] x86, microcode, AMD: Sanity-check initrd image

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Feb 2014 20:30:00 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86, microcode, AMD: Sanity-check initrd image

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:13:27PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> I thought that it may be sufficient to check for !container in
> save_microcode_in_initrd_amd() before performing relocation. If the
> signature was wrong, we would have found out about it in
> load_ucode_bsp() -> apply_ucode_in_initrd() and returned right away,

Your original test case which exploded had exactly that scenario - it
was pointing to Intel ucode so container wasn't NULL. Thus we need to
check the sig in find_ucode_in_initrd().

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/