linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] memcg, slab: cleanup memcg cache name creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140203140835.c414b6222abfd9c349648e2a@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:08:35 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc:	<mhocko@...e.cz>, <rientjes@...gle.com>, <penberg@...nel.org>,
	<cl@...ux.com>, <glommer@...il.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] memcg, slab: cleanup memcg cache name creation

On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:54:37 +0400 Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com> wrote:

> The way memcg_create_kmem_cache() creates the name for a memcg cache
> looks rather strange: it first formats the name in the static buffer
> tmp_name protected by a mutex, then passes the pointer to the buffer to
> kmem_cache_create_memcg(), which finally duplicates it to the cache
> name.
> 
> Let's clean this up by moving memcg cache name creation to a separate
> function to be called by kmem_cache_create_memcg(), and estimating the
> length of the name string before copying anything to it so that we won't
> need a temporary buffer.
> 
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3193,6 +3193,37 @@ int memcg_update_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_groups)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int memcg_print_cache_name(char *buf, size_t size,
> +		struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *root_cache)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	ret = snprintf(buf, size, "%s(%d:%s)", root_cache->name,
> +		       memcg_cache_id(memcg), cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup));
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +char *memcg_create_cache_name(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +			      struct kmem_cache *root_cache)
> +{
> +	int len;
> +	char *name;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We cannot use kasprintf() here, because cgroup_name() must be called
> +	 * under RCU protection.
> +	 */
> +	len = memcg_print_cache_name(NULL, 0, memcg, root_cache);
> +
> +	name = kmalloc(len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (name)
> +		memcg_print_cache_name(name, len + 1, memcg, root_cache);

but but but this assumes that cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup) did not
change between the two calls to memcg_print_cache_name().  If that is
the case then the locking was unneeded anyway.

> +	return name;
> +}
> +
>  int memcg_alloc_cache_params(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *s,
>  			     struct kmem_cache *root_cache)
>  {
> @@ -3397,44 +3428,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_destroy_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
>  	schedule_work(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy);
>  }
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/