[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcvp5EF_=G=VwWLfbw6mwczErTHeq4AbVALYpuAzb3c5eb2rA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 22:34:40 +0000
From: Andrew Murray <amurray@...edded-bits.co.uk>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add architecture support for PCI
On 3 February 2014 18:43, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
> index 4cc813e..ce5bad2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
> @@ -120,9 +120,13 @@ static inline u64 __raw_readq(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
> /*
> * I/O port access primitives.
> */
> +#define arch_has_dev_port() (0)
> #define IO_SPACE_LIMIT 0xffff
> #define PCI_IOBASE ((void __iomem *)(MODULES_VADDR - SZ_2M))
>
> +#define ioport_map(port, nr) (PCI_IOBASE + ((port) & IO_SPACE_LIMIT))
> +#define ioport_unmap(addr)
I'm not sure that this will work. The in[bwl], out[bwl] macros in
arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h already add the PCI_IOBASE offset.
Instead of these two #defines, why not just enforce that
GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP is enabled? Or at least wrap these defines with 'if
(!config_enabled(CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP))' or similar.
> +
> static inline u8 inb(unsigned long addr)
> {
> return readb(addr + PCI_IOBASE);
Andrew Murray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists