linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PPC: KVM: fix VCPU run for HV KVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:03:12 +1100
From:	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To:	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
CC:	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org mailing list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC: KVM: fix VCPU run for HV KVM

On 01/13/2014 02:44 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 10.01.2014, at 08:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru> wrote:
> 
>> When write to MMIO happens and there is an ioeventfd for that and
>> is handled successfully, ioeventfd_write() returns 0 (success) and
>> kvmppc_handle_store() returns EMULATE_DONE. Then kvmppc_emulate_mmio()
>> converts EMULATE_DONE to RESUME_GUEST_NV and this broke from the loop.
>>
>> This adds handling of RESUME_GUEST_NV in kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv().
>>
>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>> Suggested-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
>> ---
>>
>> This definitely needs a better commit message. Please, help.
>> ps. it seems like ioeventfd never worked on ppc64. hm.
>>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> index 072287f..24f363f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static int kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> 				vcpu->arch.fault_dar, vcpu->arch.fault_dsisr);
>> 			srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, srcu_idx);
>> 		}
>> -	} while (r == RESUME_GUEST);
>> +	} while ((r == RESUME_GUEST_NV) || (r == RESUME_GUEST));
> 
> How about
> 
>   while(!(r & RESUME_FLAG_HOST));


Rather "while(!(r & RESUME_FLAG_HOST) && (r > 0));" and still not obvious
that this is really better.

Paul agrees with the original patch (and made a better commit message for
our internal tree) but I just cannot make him reply in this thread, keep
constantly asking him but to no avail :)


> That should cover all RESUME_GUEST_XXX cases just fine. Apart from that
> I agree that we should check for ! FLAG_HOST bit rather than the actual
> RESUME_GUEST value in all case where we check for it (read: please
> update all places).

There are 3 places remotely similar to this and none of them requires a fix
like above.



-- 
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/