[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52F0E8C6.5090006@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:19:02 -0500
From: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
To: Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@...sol.com>
CC: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, cjb@...top.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...aro.org,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
swarren@...dotorg.org, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, rob@...dley.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add support for Qualcomm chipsets
Hi Georgi,
On 01/30/2014 01:45 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> This patchset adds basic support of the Secure Digital Host Controller
> Interface compliant controller found in Qualcomm chipsets.
>
> Tested with eMMC and various micro SD cards on APQ8074 Dragonboard.
[...]
> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 83 ++
> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 13 +
> drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 938 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 1035 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
You must have added entries to the Dragonboard device tree source to test
these changes. Why not include them with this patchset? Is there a stand-alone
patch that I've overlooked?
Thanks,
Christopher
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists