linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 05/16] ARM: use a function table for determining instruction interpreter action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52F04B18.4020905@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:06:16 -0500
From:	David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
To:	"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	davem@...emloft.net, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/16] ARM: use a function table for determining instruction
 interpreter action

On 02/03/14 09:24, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 15:05 -0500, David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@...aro.org>
>>
>> Make the instruction interpreter call back to semantic action functions
>> through a function pointer array provided by the invoker.  The interpreter
>> decodes the instructions into groups and uses the group number to index
>> into the supplied array.  kprobes and uprobes code will each supply their
>> own array of functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
>> @@ -378,10 +378,11 @@ static const int decode_struct_sizes[NUM_DECODE_TYPES] = {
>>    */
>>   int __kprobes
>>   kprobe_decode_insn(kprobe_opcode_t insn, struct arch_specific_insn *asi,
>> -		   const union decode_item *table, bool thumb)
>> +		   const union decode_item *table, bool thumb,
>> +		   const union decode_action *actions)
>>   {
>> -	const struct decode_header *h = (struct decode_header *)table;
>> -	const struct decode_header *next;
>> +	struct decode_header *h = (struct decode_header *)table;
>> +	struct decode_header *next;
>
> The decode tables are fixed structures which nothing should want to
> modify, so I think the const's above should be kept. I believe that
> you've had to resort to changing them because the following typedef
> lacks a 'const' on the final argument....
>

I've made the change.

> [...]
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.h b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.h
>> index c610fa9..81b6e61 100644
> [...]
>>
>> +typedef enum kprobe_insn (probes_custom_decode_t)(kprobe_opcode_t,
>> +						  struct arch_specific_insn *,
>> +						  struct decode_header *);
>> +
>
> Adding 'const' above will also have the knock on effect of requiring
> const on all the 'custom decode' functions as well.
>

I've made those numerous changes as well.

-dl

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/