linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 16/16] ARM: Remove uprobes dependency on kprobes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:15:15 -0500
From:	David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
To:	"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	davem@...emloft.net, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/16] ARM: Remove uprobes dependency on kprobes

On 02/03/14 10:45, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 15:05 -0500, David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@...aro.org>
>>
>> Now that arm uprobes support has been made separate from the arm kprobes code
>> the Kconfig can be changed to reflect that.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 -
>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> index fec5a6b..9ddc4ae 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ config NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE
>>          def_bool y
>>
>>   config ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES
>> -	depends on KPROBES
>>   	def_bool y
>>
>>   config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK
>
>
> Was this patch meant to have other contents? If not, it seems a bit
> pointless as all it does is remove a line added in the previous patch,
> so should just be folded into that one.
>

That patch was added late to a much earlier rev.  It should have been 
merged with the previous patch before now.  I have just done so.

-dl

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/