lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140204165033.GB13928@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date:	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:50:33 +0100
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, dave.taht@...il.com,
	John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>, andrewmcgr@...il.com,
	Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>, sandyinchina@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] CPU Jitter RNG: Enable compilation

On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 05:39:57PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 05:19:52PM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > Also, I consider the execution speed of the entropy collection is not 
> > really an issue because the RNG delivers random numbers at a 
> > comparatively high rate. Any other noise source feeding into random.c 
> > delivers data with far less speed.
> 
> Compiling the kernel with -O0 could add some other problems, like
> e.g. not doing enough constant folding which could result in linking
> errors. I guess it is not a problem currently though, but some of the
> compile time checks depend on this (compiletime_assert and such).
> 
> Have you looked into adding compiler barriers into relevant places in the
> loops to stop the compiler from optimizing and spill out the values from the
> registers to their memory locations?

Quick follow-up:

Maybe you can get some ideas how to stop the compiler from optimizing code
from commit fe8c8a126806fe ("crypto: more robust crypto_memneq"). Maybe also
volatile could be helpful and OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR seems to be a good candidate
to use here, too.

Greetings,

  Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ