linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: __set_page_dirty_nobuffers uses spin_lock_irqseve instead of spin_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHGf_=qhRvcJAP0cwDgAjuPewmUoRe+sJZCDJ_uik48RXSaOZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 12:10:45 -0500
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: __set_page_dirty_nobuffers uses spin_lock_irqseve
 instead of spin_lock_irq

> Indeed, good catch.  Do we need the same treatment for
> __set_page_dirty_buffers() that can be called by way of
> clear_page_dirty_for_io()?

Indeed. I posted a patch fixed __set_page_dirty() too. plz see

Subject: [PATCH] __set_page_dirty uses spin_lock_irqsave instead of
spin_lock_irq
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/