[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXyZjvfVek2=fapFcuOQTU=-8xUj6T-wE6t=_fGVHXPKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:14:54 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, Martin.Runge@...de-schwarz.com,
Andreas.Brief@...de-schwarz.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/9] Make vsyscall_gtod_data handling x86 generic
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:15 AM, <stefani@...bold.net> wrote:
> From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
>
> This patch move the vsyscall_gtod_data handling out of vsyscall_64.c
> into an additonal file vsyscall_gtod.c to make the functionality
> available for x86 32 bit kernel.
>
> It also adds a new vsyscall_32.c which setup the VVAR page.
Other than the unconditional __set_fixmap calls, I think this is okay.
(Can you *please* directly answer review comments rather than just
sending out new versions at high speed. The current approach means
that I need to reread the patch again every time to see how you've
responded, and I'm currently disinclined to believe that a new version
will actually address a review comment *at all*.)
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists