[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52F13350.2020300@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:07:04 +0530
From: sohny thomas <sohny.kernel@...il.com>
To: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
Sohny Thomas <sthomas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, davem@...emloft.net,
kumuda <kumuda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added
while assigning a address
On Monday 03 February 2014 09:56 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> 4) make flush not remove the fe80::/64 address
>>
>> Least favourable to me. I guess this also woud need iproute change
>> and seems most difficult to do.
> Why using this command 'ip -6 route flush proto static' isn't possible?
Ok I tried this and it works fine ( i.e, leaves out removing Link Local
route), but I think this is a workaround to a problem that occurs if
anyone actually deletes a Link local route
> I think that we know what kind of route is added for these TAHI tests,
> hence
> it's better to remove only routes added manually (or by a routing daemon if
> it's the case).
> Removing kernel routes may hide bugs: imagine the kernel adds a wrong
> route,
> TAHI will not detect it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists